Entries Comments



Home

Buy Windows 7 Today


Chain of Fools : Upgrading through every version of windows (HQ)

8 March, 2011 (21:43) | Microsoft Windows 7 | By: admin


For further information on this experiment see my blog : http://rasteri.blogspot.com/2011/03/chain-of-fools-upgrading-through-every.html

Duration : 0:9:50


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Comment from cspower12
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

nice:)
nice:)

Comment from bohemianlife
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

@SlfTh3Chl3f Yes, …
@SlfTh3Chl3f Yes, he mentions it on his blog.

Comment from DrLazybones
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

Hey what about NT …
Hey what about NT 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and the legends 3.51 and 4.0. Given the parallel development of the UI that Microsoft was doing I wonder if 3.51 would pickup all the settings from a windows 3.1 upgrade since it had an identical program manager.

A very impressive experiment, and love the login username “twatface” very scottish excellent work :D

Comment from cinnamondouche
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

Oh shit! Not …
Oh shit! Not reversi!

Comment from Joestrange8
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

It would be cool if …
It would be cool if you did the same thing with a Mac OS

Comment from brightblondegir
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

i had fun following …
i had fun following the mouse with my mouse. :)

Comment from DrLazybones
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

Hey what about NT …
Hey what about NT 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and the legends 3.51 and 4.0. Given the parallel development of the UI that Microsoft was doing I wonder if 3.51 would pickup all the settings from a windows 3.1 upgrade since it had an identical program manager.

A very impressive experiment, and love the login username “twatface” very scottish excellent work :D

Comment from DrLazybones
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

Hey what about NT …
Hey what about NT 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and the legends 3.51 and 4.0. Given the parallel development of the UI that Microsoft was doing I wonder if 3.51 would pickup all the settings from a windows 3.1 upgrade since it had an identical program manager.

A very impressive experiment, and love the login username “twatface” very scottish excellent work :D

Comment from labandus
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

very good ;)

very good ;)

Comment from baronofhawkland
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

try that out Mac …
try that out Mac hipsters….

Comment from woodwyrm
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

awesome! :,D
awesome! :,D

Comment from helraiser
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

Very awesome and …
Very awesome and yes, not boring at all! Suddenly I want to try and play Doom 2 on my Win7 pc :)

Comment from tdragon360
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

how long did …
how long did windows 7 take? same as vista?

Comment from top2percent
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

But can I run …
But can I run Crysis and MineSweeper st the same time?

Comment from Norosco4u
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

Why did I watch all …
Why did I watch all of this!? And why do I want to watch it again??

Comment from B15h73k
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

omg nostalgia much? …
omg nostalgia much? i remember upgrading from win3.31 to win95 on my awesome new DX4/100Mhz.

Comment from SlfTh3Chl3f
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

Did doom 2 and …
Did doom 2 and monkey island still work on windows vista and windows 7?

Comment from NeonBodyStyle93
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

That was pretty …
That was pretty cool actually. Monkey Island for the win.

Comment from ztlaa
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

wow, that was …
wow, that was awesome

Comment from NeoAndyDS
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

What an interesting …
What an interesting experiment. Knowing Windows, I would have expected that most software from early versions wouldn’t work in the least with the new OSes, specially since you are not even doing a clean install of each.

Great video.

Comment from lauroga
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

what?! windows 7 …
what?! windows 7 doesnt keep my windows 2.0 desktop color settings?!

wow windows 7 sux!

thanks for uploading this experiment! its very useful!

Comment from Copimi
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

…the box said ” …
…the box said “Requires Windows 95, NT, or better”, so I installed Linux

Comment from NiveusLeonusX
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

that was pretty …
that was pretty awesome, amazingly not boring

Comment from JURPO90
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

@MrBjoey2010 …
@MrBjoey2010 windows nt is actually just other name for regular windows nowadays (its different than 98, btu the same as 7) , and that guy said millenium edition couldnt be installed.

Comment from dalaielite
Time: March 8, 2011, 9:43 pm

Neat experiment!
Neat experiment!

Write a comment






Powered by Yahoo! Answers